Back to feed
National Law Review
National Law Review
7/23/2026
The original headline is about law firms losing cases due to intake gaps. I need to preserve key facts and make it punchy.

The original headline is about law firms losing cases due to intake gaps. I need to preserve key facts and make it punchy.

Original: The Intake Gap Costing Law Firms Cases They Should Have Retained

Short summary

72% of legal consumers move to another firm if they don't hear back within 24 hours, up from 66% a year prior. The article identifies key intake leaks: slow phone responses, inconsistent screening, unclear follow-up ownership, unconfirmed consultations, and lack of measurement. Firms that convert well respond quickly, give clear next steps, and track signed-client rates rather than just call volumes.

  • 72% of legal consumers switch firms if no response within 24 hours
  • Common intake leaks include slow responses, inconsistent screening, and no measurement
  • Successful firms treat intake as a formal system with standards and clear ownership

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more