Supreme Court Addresses Rights of Green Card Holders in Blanche v. Lau

Short summary

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Blanche v. Lau that border officers may parole returning green card holders based on suspected commission of disqualifying offenses, bypassing the traditional 'clear and convincing evidence' standard required at reentry. Paroled status—distinct from legal admission—disrupts work authorization and permanent resident benefits. Affected LPRs with unresolved criminal charges should consult immigration attorneys before international travel, as reentry now carries increased risk.

• •Border officers can now parole LPRs based on suspicion, not established proof of offense
• •Paroled status differs from admission and jeopardizes employment authorization
• •LPRs with pending criminal issues face elevated reentry risk

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.