Dev.to
7/24/2026

Reconcile before you round: lessons from a 14M-row open data study
Short summary
A 14.4M-row study of France's SIRENE business registry reveals four data-quality disciplines: reconcile every aggregate against an independent total before publishing, count and disclose all excluded rows, flag legal-structure artifacts in rankings, and bound date fields to catch bad input. The authors caught real bugs — wrong workforce status codes, 102 records dated 2027+ — by following these rules rather than trusting queries that ran without errors.
- •Reconcile aggregates against independent totals before publishing percentages
- •Count and disclose every excluded data bucket rather than silently filtering
- •Flag legal-structure artifacts (e.g., SCIs dominating 'real estate') in sector rankings
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



