Dev.to
6/15/2026

Detecting API anomalies behind a 200 OK — with statistics, not AI
Short summary
Uptime monitors often miss broken endpoints that return 200 OK—like cached errors, truncated payloads, or sudden slowdowns. This post explains per-endpoint statistical baselines (rolling mean, standard deviation, 3-sigma detection) with guardrails to catch anomalies. The author deliberately uses LLMs only for explaining anomalies, not detecting them, arguing that deterministic statistics are cheaper and more trustworthy than ML.
- •Per-endpoint baselines catch 200-OK failures (cached errors, empty payloads, slowdowns)
- •3-sigma statistical detection with anti-flapping guards replaces noisy ML
- •LLM explains the anomaly; math decides whether it's anomalous
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



