Dev.to
8/1/2026

Can Vibe Coding Work With Less Human Intervention? I'm Building a Framework to Find Out
Short summary
The author is building SDAQF, a specification-driven quality-assurance framework for vibe coding that reduces human checking by concentrating decisions on purpose, spec changes, risk, and publication. Requirements get stable IDs that persist from design through release, with gates blocking progress until evidence or approval exists. The framework explicitly does not replace human judgment on product, ethical, legal, or publication decisions.
- •SDAQF assigns stable IDs to requirements that persist from spec through release
- •Gates block progress until required evidence or human approval is present
- •Human role narrows to bounded decisions: goals, spec changes, risk, publication
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



