Dev.to
7/22/2026

The original title is: "MCPMark v2: InsForge MCP Uses 2.4x Fewer Tokens Than Supabase MCP on Claude Sonnet 4.6"
Original: MCPMark v2: InsForge on Sonnet 4.6
Short summary
InsForge reran its MCPMark benchmark on Claude Sonnet 4.6, comparing InsForge MCP against Supabase MCP across 21 Postgres tasks. InsForge achieved 28% higher Pass⁴ accuracy and used 2.4x fewer tokens, with the efficiency gap widening compared to Sonnet 4.5. The key finding: more capable models amplify the cost of incomplete backend context, making structured schema exposure increasingly important for agent efficiency.
- •InsForge MCP outperforms Supabase MCP by 28% Pass⁴ accuracy and 2.4x fewer tokens on Sonnet 4.6
- •The token-efficiency gap widened from 1.4x (Sonnet 4.5) to 2.4x (Sonnet 4.6), showing stronger models penalize missing context more
- •Structured backend context upfront reduces agent discovery queries, improving both accuracy and speed
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



