The original title is: "Why teams using AI coding assistants need deterministic security scanning in CI"

Short summary

The article argues that when multiple developers use different AI coding assistants, their individual blind spots compound rather than cancel out, creating a union of vulnerability surfaces. It pitches BrassCoders, an offline deterministic scanner running 12 static-analysis tools on every PR, as the solution. The core insight is that deterministic scanners catch what probabilistic AI reviewers miss, and CI gates enforce consistency that per-developer preferences cannot.

• •Multiple developers using different AI assistants create a union of vulnerability blind spots, not an average
• •BrassCoders runs 12 deterministic static-analysis scanners on every PR regardless of which AI assistant generated the code
• •Deterministic scanning in CI provides auditability and consistency that LLM-based code review cannot

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.