Back to feed
Dev.to
Dev.to
7/30/2026
The original title is "Claude Code Team Memory: CLAUDE.md, Git, or MCP?" which has a colon, which is not allowed. Let me rewrite it.

The original title is "Claude Code Team Memory: CLAUDE.md, Git, or MCP?" which has a colon, which is not allowed. Let me rewrite it.

Original: Claude Code Team Memory: CLAUDE.md, Git, or MCP?

Short summary

The article compares three layers of agent memory for Claude Code teams: CLAUDE.md for stable per-repo conventions, Git as the canonical code record, and an MCP memory server for live cross-machine decisions and coordination. The author argues these compose rather than compete. The post concludes with a pitch for Vibsync, the author's own MCP memory product.

  • CLAUDE.md holds durable per-repo instructions; Git is source of truth for code
  • MCP memory server captures live, cross-machine decisions and agent coordination
  • The three layers compose — but the post pitches Vibsync as the MCP solution

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more